NET METERING 3.0
THE DEATH OF DISTRIBUTED ENERGY.
In 2020, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) called for proposals
to "improve" Net Metering.
On March 15 2021, all proposals were submitted (link).
In a naked grab for even more profits, the California Investor Owned Monopolies, Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E), Southern California Edison (SCE) and San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) joined together (colluded) to submit a Solar and Distributed Energy Resource (DER) killing proposal.
Only the people, the governor and the legislators can turn back this affront: the Investor Owned Monopolies demand for increasing amounts of revenue at the expense of an affordable and cleaner future for California. California solar users paid for grid improvements, and instead of being compensated, the IOUs want to charge these ratepayers a discriminatory fee. This is a naked grab.
If this ruling stands, who will pay to put solar on their roof only to be billed for it? Answer: No one. This will effectively kill solar in California along with thousands of renewable energy jobs.
What can you do? What must you do? Will California lose its reputation as a global leader? Will the ruling democrats fail the people? Can Californians offset their investments in solar by demanding smaller and accountable Investor Owned Monopolies?
Net Metering background here.
Learn more about what's on the line.
to "improve" Net Metering.
On March 15 2021, all proposals were submitted (link).
In a naked grab for even more profits, the California Investor Owned Monopolies, Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E), Southern California Edison (SCE) and San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) joined together (colluded) to submit a Solar and Distributed Energy Resource (DER) killing proposal.
Only the people, the governor and the legislators can turn back this affront: the Investor Owned Monopolies demand for increasing amounts of revenue at the expense of an affordable and cleaner future for California. California solar users paid for grid improvements, and instead of being compensated, the IOUs want to charge these ratepayers a discriminatory fee. This is a naked grab.
If this ruling stands, who will pay to put solar on their roof only to be billed for it? Answer: No one. This will effectively kill solar in California along with thousands of renewable energy jobs.
What can you do? What must you do? Will California lose its reputation as a global leader? Will the ruling democrats fail the people? Can Californians offset their investments in solar by demanding smaller and accountable Investor Owned Monopolies?
Net Metering background here.
Learn more about what's on the line.